Anti-doping programs are not efficacious

Great changes occurred in some types of sports after the USADA publicized its report on Lance Armstrong. The legendary American cyclist was administering anabolic steroids and other doping products throughout the whole cycling career but he never tested positive for any banned medication. He utilized several effective methods to avoid detection. Nonetheless, finally he was found guilty of doping.
Lance Armstrong’s doping case has manifested that anti-doping programs failed. So, they must be altered. Otherwise, competitions will be unfair. We’ll never distinguish real sports heroes.
These factors influenced not only on cycling but also on other sports. Several sports organizations stated that anti-doping policies should be modified in order to catch those that apply anabolic steroids and/or other related drugs.
Not only anti-doping officers but also athletes claim that anti-doping programs should be changed. Some sportspersons want to assure that their sport is clean. For example, several tennis players affirm that more drug testing should be conducted in tennis. It is important to notice that such tennis stars, as Novak Djokovic, Roger Federer and Andy Murray, think that anti-doping program is not quite efficient in tennis. They argue that more drug testing is required in order to be sure that tennis is free of doping.
Novak Djokovic affirmed that he would submit to more drug testing in order to promote cleaning tennis of dopers.
The Swiss tennis player Roger Federer also confirmed that more tests for banned medicines should be conducted in tennis. He noticed that earlier he was subjected to more tests. Then the number of tests became lower in tennis.
When it comes to the Scottish tennis player Andy Muray, he said that more out-of-competition testing should take place. While tennis players are always tested during competitions, they are not tested frequently while being not in competitions.