California legislators: anti-doping agencies violate rights of athletes

Legislators of California state that anti-doping agencies violate fundamental constitutional rights of sportspersons suspected of doping. So, sportspersons that have never tested positive for any prohibited substances become targets of investigations. That’s why the legislators asked Congress to review this issue.
It is known that the USADA is sponsored chiefly by taxpayers. The Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) gives 10 million dollars each year. This governmental office induces fighting against administration of prohibited substances. Its goal is to exterminate illegal manufacture and drug use, crimes connected with usage of illegal products, etc.
The request of California lawmakers was initiated soon after the celebrated cyclist Lance Armstrong decided not to appeal his lifetime ban from professional sports.
Everybody knows that the former cyclist Lance Armstrong has lost his 7 titles acquired at Tour de France. He was also banned from competitions entirely.
In June Lance Armstrong filed a lawsuit against the USADA, affirming that his constitutional rights were violated. But the judge Sam Sparks didn’t agree to accept the lawsuit. He claimed that the USADA acted properly. Sam Sparks also noticed that the USADA was established in order to clean sports from athletes who take forbidden products.
California Senator Michael Rubio noticed that the judge didn’t act appropriately, refusing to accept the lawsuit against the USADA. Thus, the senators stated that the USADA violated rights of several athletes. That’s why they asked the Congress to review the issue.