Associated Press and New York Daily News interviewed Roger Clemens jurors

Names of twelve individuals (4 men and 8 women) that composed jury at the case against Roger Clemens were released by the judge Reggie Walton.
The government wanted the jury to be convinced that Roger Clemens had lied before the Congress about usage of steroids and HGH. But since the jury acquitted Roger Clemens, the government criticized the individuals who served as the jury. Several persons that served as the jury were interviewed.
A political activist, an art historian, a teacher of deaf kids, an official of Treasury Department and an employee of the Canadian Embassy were included in the jury.
The political activist Joyce Robinson-Paul was interviewed by the New York Daily News some days after Roger Clemens was cleared of the charges. She confirmed that the jurors understood that they had to be fair to both the government and the baseball player. But they didn’t find anything that had to be prosecuted.  Later she also noticed that the federal prosecutors were not capable to prove their affirmations.
The employee of the Canadian Embassy Bradford Weaver stated that the government acted wrongly. This person noticed that such situations should not occur again. He also noted that there was nothing to be prosecuted. He was interviewed by the Associated Press. He also pointed out that each juror was convinced from the very beginning that Roger Clemens was not guilty of any charge. Weaver claimed that each juror was unanimous.
Bradford Weaver was also asked whether he considered that Roger Clemens really administered steroids. The Associated Press also asked him whether he thought that the governmental case against the athlete represented just the waste of taxpayers’ funds. But he didn’t answer the questions.
Another juror who chose not to be named noticed that the jurors were wondering how the government could spend huge sums of money during 5 years in order to prosecute the baseball player. This person confirmed that it was impossible to understand why the prosecution took place 5 years.
Other jurors didn’t present any information.
As for federal prosecutors, they seemed to be totally disappointed. They refused to respond to the affirmations presented by the jurors.